Governance
Clear ownership for every public explanation and claim
Audiencelab content should serve a reader decision, identify its author and reviewer, cite primary sources, distinguish evidence from interpretation, and show a truthful update date. AI-assisted drafting is permitted, but publication requires human factual review and accountable ownership.
Overview
01Sources
Prefer official platform documentation, customer-approved evidence, and original methodology. Link to the primary source near the claim.
02Review
Technical content requires a subject-matter review. Customer outcomes require permission and a claim-ledger record. Legal or privacy statements require appropriate review.
03Corrections and updates
Correct material errors promptly. Change dateModified only when the page has been meaningfully reviewed or updated, and retain a record of the change.
Process
- Define the reader and decision
- Draft with primary sources
- Complete factual and technical review
- Validate claims, links, schema, and dates
- Assign the next review date
Limitations
What this page does not prove or guarantee.
- Published content is general information, not legal or financial advice.
- Platform capabilities and policies can change after publication.
- A source citation does not make an inference causal.
Questions
- Does Audiencelab use AI to create content?
- AI-assisted drafting may be used, but a named human remains responsible for factual review and publication.
- How are corrections handled?
- Material errors should be corrected promptly and the page review date updated truthfully.
- How can an issue be reported?
- Email support@audiencelab.ai with the page URL and concern.